Online casino free play

Oj Simpson Fall

Review of: Oj Simpson Fall

Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 08.10.2020
Last modified:08.10.2020

Summary:

Sie dabei sicherlich mГglichst viel Geld gewinnen. Reservierungen sind mit Rome2rio auГerdem ganz einfach und unkompliziert, Spiele wie. Wir listen fГr Sie die besten Casinos ohne deutsche Lizenz.

Oj Simpson Fall

Vom Mord-Vorwurf wurde O. J. Simpson freigesprochen. Hinter Gitter musste er trotzdem. Seine Geschichte ist eine Parabel auf das moderne. Juni wurde O.J. Simpsons geschiedene Frau Nicole Brown und deren Freund Ron Goldman zwischen 22 und Uhr bestialisch. Simpson – Unveröffentlichte Aufnahmen“ widmet. Bisher unter Verschluss gehaltenes Archivmaterial von Simpsons Aussage wird darin erstmals gezeigt. Die.

Der tiefe Fall von American-Football-Spieler O.J. Simpson

Worum ging es vordergründig im O. J. Simpson-Fall? Mord an einer jungen Frau und ihrem männlichen Begleiter, der möglicherweise ihr Liebhaber war. Es ist der spektakulärste Fall der US-Kriminalgeschichte: In Los Angeles muss sich der frühere Sportstar O. J. Simpson wegen Doppelmordes. Dank seiner Karriere als Footballstar steigt O. J. Simpson in die High Society auf und fällt tief. Im Prozess gegen den mutmasslichen.

Oj Simpson Fall All-American hero Video

OJ25 Ep10: The OJ Simpson murder trial

Oj Simpson Fall Geschworene in einem Jury-Prozess dürfen während des Prozesses keine Informationen über den Fall aus den Medien erfahren und mit keiner anderen Person. Orenthal James Simpson (* 9. Juli in San Francisco, Kalifornien) ist ein ehemaliger US-amerikanischer American-Football-Spieler und Schauspieler. Schuldig oder nicht? Der Fall O. J. Simpson hat die US-Gesellschaft gespalten. Er soll seine Ex-Frau Nicole und ihren neuen Liebhaber brutal erstochen haben. Es ist der spektakulärste Fall der US-Kriminalgeschichte: In Los Angeles muss sich der frühere Sportstar O. J. Simpson wegen Doppelmordes.

Werden Oj Simpson Fall. - Schwarze Schafe des Sports

Die damals jährige Clark, eine erfahrene Juristin, die bereits Www.Spielen.Com/Gold Strike Verurteilungen in Mordverfahren erreicht hatte, wurde zur Hauptanklägerin bestellt.
Oj Simpson Fall Erst muss er ins Gefängnis. Auf die Frage, ob er sich erinnere, in seinem Haus und seinem Kostenlose A Bronco geblutet zu haben, gab er an, er habe am Tatabend in seinem Haus Sofortüberweisung Comdirect und währenddessen sein Mobiltelefon aus dem Bronco geholt. Simpson in einem Bademantel in der Hauseinfahrt erschienen und habe geschrien, er wolle diese Frau nicht mehr in seinem Bett und habe zwei andere Frauen. Zwei seiner Freundinnen berichteten von tätlichen Übergriffen und teils lebensbedrohlicher häuslicher Gewalt, die sie in ihren Beziehungen mit Jason Simpson erfahren hätten.

Auch eine Jackpot.Com Seriös Lizenz vorweisen kГnnen. - Inhaltsverzeichnis

US-Medien strahlten Aufnahmen eines Tonbandes unbekannter Herkunft aus, auf dem Simpson die Sammler beschuldigt, diese Sammlerstücke von ihm gestohlen zu haben.
Oj Simpson Fall Der Strafprozess gegen O. J. Simpson (offiziell: The People of the State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson) war ein Gerichtsverfahren im Jahr , in dem der ehemalige US-amerikanische Football-Star und Schauspieler O. J. Simpson wegen Mordes an seiner früheren Ehefrau Nicole Brown Simpson und dem Kellner Ronald Goldman angeklagt wurde. Hip hop artist Magneto Dayo released a "diss track" song titled "OJ Simpson" in which he insults his ex-girlfriend/artist V-Nasty, by referencing the Simpson murder case. The song's lyrics were also added to the Houston Press ' list of "The 15 Most Messed-Up O.J. Simpson Lyrics". Fall from grace: Simpson is shown in his official Los Angeles Police Department booking photo after being arrest for double murder His ex-wife and her friend were found stabbed to death on the. On October 3 Simpson was found not guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. After the verdict, polls of public opinion continued to break down along racial lines. Whites were largely dismayed by the jury’s decision, whereas the majority of African Americans supported it, seeing Simpson’s acquittal as a victory in a legal system that systematically discriminated against blacks. o.j. simpson The rise and fall of O.J. Simpson Simpson was acquitted in of murder in the slayings of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Goldman, her friend. He was found civilly liable for. Simpson for Political Correctness". In seinen Flug nach Chicago checkte Simpson mit nur drei Gepäckstücken ein. Prosecutors had requested that Ito restrict the tour to only Kochspiele Für Mädche Kostenlos crime scene for this exact reason, but Ito refused, and came under heavy criticism for allowing the defense to control Paypal Apple Wallet trial. The Guardian. Simpson was running late but Bälle Schießen his flight. As a result of a incident in Las VegasNevada regarding an attempt to steal materials Simpson claimed were stolen from him, Simpson was convicted in of multiple felonies including use of a deadly weapon to commit kidnapping, burglary and armed robbery, and sentenced to a minimum nine years to a maximum 33 years in Rommee Spiel. Daraufhin floh Simpson in seinem Bentley. February 4, Mit Festnetz Bezahlen, Simpson believed, had been planning to open a restaurant using proceeds from cocaine sales. He also noted that the jury was never informed about items found in the Bronco. Bugliosi also said the prosecutors should have gone into more detail about Simpson's domestic abuse and presented evidence contrary to the Oj Simpson Fall assertion that Simpson was a leader in the black community. Vannatter war erst am With no witnesses to the crime, the prosecution was dependent on DNA as the only physical evidence linking Simpson to the crime. X Tip Sportwetten grew that race riots, similar to the riots inwould erupt across Los Angeles and the rest of the country if Simpson were convicted of the Mit Online Trading Geld Verdienen. Auch sei es möglich, Wta Rom bei Entnahmen zu Testzwecken geringe Mengen Blutes verschüttet würden oder in sonstiger Weise verloren gingen. J trialabgerufen am Die Goldman-Familie bezeichnete Jackpot.Com Seriös Theorie als unverantwortlich. Zusatzzahl Beim Lotto from the original Wertung Poker December 12, Desert Nights Casino O.J. Simpson: The rise and fall. Nearly 20 years after the start of the O.J. Simpson trial, CNN's Stephanie Elam looks at Simpson's rise to fame and his fall from the public's good graces. O.J. Simpson trial, criminal trial of former college and professional gridiron football star O.J. Simpson, who was acquitted in of the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. It was one of the most notorious criminal trials in American history.  · OJ wpadł w szał, gdy zobaczył nieznanego mężczyznę (miał nim być kelner, Ron Goldman), który podjeżdża pod dom. „Pojawia się Charlie, to facet z którym się ostatnio zaprzyjaźniłem”, mówi Simpson: „I nie wiem dlaczego poszedł do domu Nicole, ale powiedział mi»Nie uwierzysz co się tam dzieje, to musi się skończyć Author: Gabriela Czernecka.

Nicole decided not to press charges, but the city lawyer went ahead and prosecuted OJ for spousal battery. He was fined and given two years' probation.

Simpson was born in He was a bow-legged child who had rickets, but was able to escape the San Francisco slums by the fact that he was an extremely good runner.

He eventually went on to become one of the top running backs in American football history. He attended the University of Southern California, where he was named the country's top college football player in He then moved to Buffalo, New York, where he spent most of his career.

In , he was forced to retire due to injuries. She became a household name as the lead prosecutor in the Simpson trial, one of the only cases she ever lost.

Clark has published multiple mystery novels and short stories, with her latest book, "The Competition," came out in July Gil Garcetti : The Los Angeles district attorney during the Simpson trial served one more term after the trial despite criticism of how he handled it, but eventually made a career change.

Garcetti has created multiple books of photographic essays, including "Reverence for Beauty. Johnnie Cochran : During Simpson's trial, Cochran famously quipped, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit," in reminding jurors during his summation that the former star football running back couldn't fit his hand inside a bloody glove found at the scene of the killings.

Cochran died on March 29, , at age 67, in his home in Los Angeles from an inoperable brain tumor. Robert Shapiro : Part of Simpson's "dream team" legal defense, he went on to write best-selling legal books and offer legal analysis for news programs.

Shapirio also co-founded do-it-yourself legal website LegalZoom and in memory of his son, who died of an overdose, founded the Brent Shapiro Foundation.

Lee Bailey : Bailey was the "dream team" attorney who pointed out racist statements by prosecution witness Det. Mark Fuhrman. Bailey later was disbarred in Massachusetts and Florida for misconduct, and as of had given up seeking readmission to the bar.

He spends his days flying airplanes and helicopters. Robert Kardashian : A close friend of Simpson and an attorney who would go on to participate in the trial as part of Simpson's defense team.

Kardashian died at age 59 in from esophageal cancer. Alan Dershowitz : Dershowitz played a major role in Simpson's defense team.

He retired in after 50 years of teaching at Harvard University. Dershowitz has written 30 books. They divorced in Two years later the year-old former waitress and her friend, Ron Goldman, 25, were found dead outside her townhouse, the victims of a frenzied knife attack.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree See Article History.

Simpson centre and his attorneys F. Lee Bailey left and Johnnie Cochran reacting to the not-guilty verdict at Simpson's criminal trial, October 3, Get exclusive access to content from our First Edition with your subscription.

Subscribe today. Wenn es keinen Grund gebe, finde er trotzdem einen. At the time, my office was located above a Marine recruiting center […].

I saw Mr. Ferman [Sic! I remember him distinctly because of his height and build. I asked would [Sic! He said something about burning them or bombing them.

I was too shaken to remember the exact words he used, however, I do remember that what he said was probably the most horrible thing I had ever heard someone say.

Fuhrman habe seine abwertenden Ansichten über Schwarze nachdrücklich und in einer Art zum Ausdruck gebracht, die von Hass, Arroganz und Verachtung geprägt gewesen sei.

Im Kreuzverhör von Staatsanwaltschaft und Verteidigung verneinte Fuhrman, in der Vergangenheit rassistische Ansichten vertreten zu haben. Weder sei ihm die Zeugin Kathleen Bell bekannt, noch habe er die ihm zugeschriebenen belastenden Aussagen gemacht.

Er könne unter Eid aussagen, diesen Ausdruck in den vergangenen 10 Jahren nicht benutzt zu haben. Dass er es getan habe und er dies vergessen habe, sei nicht möglich.

Is it possible that you have forgotten that act on your part? BAILEY: And you say under oath that you have not addressed any black person as a nigger or spoken about black people as niggers in the past 10 years, Detective Fuhrman?

McKinny gab an, in den Jahren bis beruflich mit Fuhrman in Kontakt gestanden zu haben. Er habe sie in dieser Zeit bei ihrer Arbeit an Filmprojekten beraten.

Von allen Interviews habe sie — mit Fuhrmans Kenntnis — Tonbandaufzeichnungen mit einer Länge von insgesamt 12 Stunden angefertigt.

Fuhrman habe in ihren Gesprächen angegeben, er habe in seiner Arbeit als Polizist Berichte gefälscht, entlastende Beweisstücke ignoriert und festgenommene schwarze Verdachtspersonen misshandelt.

Da Fuhrman in der Tatnacht eine wesentliche Rolle in der unmittelbaren Ermittlungsarbeit am Tatort und auf Simpsons Anwesen spielte, war dieser einer der Hauptbelastungszeugen der Anklage.

Wesentliche Beweisstücke, insbesondere der auf Simpsons Grundstück gefundene blutverschmierte Handschuh, waren von Fuhrman sichergestellt worden.

Fuhrman kam daher zu diesem Zeitpunkt in der Strategie der Anklage eine zentrale Rolle zu. Nach McKinnys Zeugenvernehmung behaupteten Simpsons Anwälte, die Glaubwürdigkeit Fuhrmans sei durch seine nachweisliche Falschaussage zerstört, und gingen im weiteren Prozessverlauf dazu über, Fuhrman geradezu zu dämonisieren.

In seinem letzten Interview, welches kurz nach dem Mordfall im Juli geführt wurde, gab er gegenüber McKinny an, der zentrale Zeuge des Prozesses zu sein.

Ohne seine Aussage und die von ihm gesicherten Beweismittel werde die Anklage den Fall verlieren. In ihrem Schlussplädoyer sagte die Chefanklägerin Marcia Clark, Fuhrman sei ein Rassist, hätte nie Polizist werden dürfen und man wünsche sich, es gäbe eine solche Person nicht auf der Erde.

Itos Frau Capt. Margaret York arbeitete zu diesem Zeitpunkt in führender Position in der Polizeiverwaltung von Los Angeles und war ehemals eine Vorgesetzte von Fuhrman.

Auf einer der Aufnahmen ist Fuhrman zu hören, wie er sich über Yorks Aussehen lustig macht und darauf anspielt, sie habe ihre Position nur aufgrund geschlechtsspezifischer Bevorzugung erlangt.

Die Anklage nahm diesen Antrag jedoch im Hinblick auf die unsicheren Rechtsfolgen für den weiteren Prozessverlauf zurück.

Auch Ito selbst gelangte zu der Überzeugung, sich nicht selbst für befangen erklären zu müssen. Da Fuhrman nun rassistische Aussagen nachgewiesen worden waren, konnte die Verteidigung auf ein klares Motiv verweisen, welches Fuhrman dazu bewogen haben könnte, Simpson den Mord fälschlicherweise anzulasten.

Hierzu wurde Fuhrman erneut von der Verteidigung in den Zeugenstand gerufen. Fuhrman wurde diesmal von seinem eigenen Anwalt begleitet.

Fuhrman wurde von Gerald Uelmen, einem von Simpsons Anwälten, befragt, ob seine Aussagen im Prozess der Wahrheit entsprochen hätten, ob er Polizeiberichte gefälscht habe.

Fuhrman antwortete, offensichtlich auf Anraten seines eigenen Anwalts, er wolle sich auf den 5. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten berufen, wonach sich niemand vor Gericht selbst belasten müsse.

Simpsons Verteidiger erwiderte, ob dies für alle Fragen der Verteidiger gelte, was von Fuhrman bejaht wurde. Trotzdem bestand Simpsons Anwalt darauf, Fuhrman direkt dazu zu befragen, ob er im Simpson-Prozess Beweismittel gefälscht habe, woraufhin Fuhrman erneut von seinem Zeugnisverweigerungsrecht Gebrauch machte.

Did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case? Fuhrman wurde daraufhin von der Staatsanwaltschaft von Los Angeles wegen Meineids angeklagt. Die Ermittler, insbesondere Mark Fuhrman und Philip Vannatter, hätten sich von Anfang an auf Simpson als einzigen Verdächtigen festgelegt und versucht, ihn durch Manipulation von Beweismitteln zu belasten, um eine Verurteilung erreichen zu können.

Teile des Ermittler-Teams waren bereits zu früheren Zeitpunkten an Ermittlungen zum Vorwurf der häuslichen Gewalt gegen Simpson involviert.

Mark Fuhrman war bereits im Jahr wegen eines Notrufs zu Simpsons Haus gerufen worden, wo er ein Auto mit demolierter Windschutzscheibe , eine verängstigte Nicole Brown und Simpson mit einem Baseballschläger vorgefunden habe.

Brown habe angegeben, ihr Ehemann wolle sie umbringen. Nach eigenen Angaben waren sie um das Wohlergehen von Simpson und anderer Hausbewohner besorgt.

Sie hätten mit Simpson klären wollen, wie mit dessen Kindern weiter verfahren werden solle, die in Browns Haus zur Tatzeit schliefen.

Auf Simpsons Anwesen öffnete niemand die Tür. Fuhrman kletterte daraufhin über die Begrenzungsmauer des Grundstücks, befragte Simpsons Tochter Arnelle und begab sich zur ersten Spurensicherung in den Garten von Simpsons Anwesen, obwohl ihm zu diesem Zeitpunkt noch kein Durchsuchungsbefehl vorlag.

Hierbei gab er an, den blutigen Handschuh und verschiedene Blutspuren in und um Simpsons Haus gefunden zu haben. Zur Rechtfertigung dieser Vorgehensweise gab Vannatter an, es sei unklar gewesen, was sich in Simpsons Haus abgespielt habe.

Die Ermittler seien um das Wohl Simpsons besorgt gewesen. Es sei zum Beispiel möglich gewesen, dass sich eine Geiselnahme ereignet haben könnte.

Dieser hatte hierfür keine Erklärung, woraufhin Simpsons Anwälte die Verwerfung aller Beweismittel aus der Tatnacht wegen einer ungerechtfertigten Hausdurchsuchung forderten.

Da die Durchsuchung des Anwesens ungesetzlich war, seien auch alle dort gefundenen Beweismittel nicht vor Gericht verwertbar Früchte des vergifteten Baumes.

Die vorsitzende Richterin lehnte dies mit der Begründung ab, die Ermittler hätten einen triftigen Grund zum Betreten von Simpsons Anwesen gehabt, nämlich ein Arrangement für Simpsons Kinder zu treffen.

Hierbei gefundene Indizien auf eine Straftat, wie die Blutspuren, seien vor Gericht verwertbar. Er begleitete die Polizisten danach zu einer freiwilligen Vernehmung ohne Anwalt in der Polizeidirektion von Los Angeles.

Hierbei wurden ihm von den Polizisten Handschellen angelegt, obwohl er zu diesem Zeitpunkt noch nicht formell als Verdächtiger oder Beschuldigter galt.

Die Polizei gab später an, es habe sich um ein Versehen gehandelt. Staatsanwaltschaft und Polizei hätten niemals nach einem anderen Täter gesucht.

Brown habe mit Drogensüchtigen verkehrt. Zeugenvernehmungen ergaben, dass Polizeibeamte häufig bei Simpson zu Gast waren, und den Tennisplatz und Swimmingpool seines Anwesens benutzen durften.

Dafür spreche auch, dass bei mehreren Verdachtsfällen häuslicher Gewalt, zu denen Polizisten des LAPD hinzugerufen wurden, in der Vergangenheit nur in einem Fall, am Neujahrstag , polizeilich gegen Simpson vorgegangen wurde.

Der wohl schwerwiegendste Vorwurf der Verteidigung war, dass Fuhrman den blutigen Handschuh auf Simpsons Anwesen deponiert habe, um ihn später als eindeutigen Beweis für Simpsons Schuld präsentieren zu können.

Der Handschuh habe eigentlich auch am Tatort neben dem zweiten Exemplar gelegen und sei dann von Fuhrman oder Vanatter dort aufgenommen und auf Simpsons Anwesen platziert worden.

Fuhrman habe den Handschuh als erster eintreffender Polizist auf Simpsons Anwesen gefunden. Kein Ermittler habe vor ihm den Handschuh gesehen.

Dies sei jedoch mehrere Stunden nach Simpsons Abflug nach Chicago gewesen. Das Blut am Handschuh hätte bis dahin getrocknet sein müssen. Bei einer Socke wurde auf beiden Seiten ein fast identisches Muster der Blutbefleckung gefunden.

Henry Lee, ein in Forensikerkreisen weltbekannter Experte und Zeuge der Verteidigung, sagte dazu aus, dass — hätte Simpson die Socken bei der Tat getragen — ein solches Muster nur hätte auftreten können, wenn Simpson ein Loch in seinem Knöchel gehabt habe.

Vielmehr sei es konsistent mit einer nachträglichen Beträufelung der Socke mit einem Blutstropfen. Das Video sei aber vor den Fotos aufgenommen worden, was seitens der Verteidigung als Hinweis darauf interpretiert wurde, dass die blutbefleckten Socken dort nachträglich platziert wurden.

Die Anklage gab mit Hinweis auf die Zeugenaussagen von Fung und Mazzola an, das Video sei nach der Beweisaufnahme gemacht worden, um zu belegen, dass die Polizei keine Gegenstände aus Simpsons Haus entwendet habe.

Die Zeitanzeige im Video sei nicht entsprechend angepasst worden. Juni stimmte Simpson bei seiner Vernehmung durch die Polizei auch einer Blutentnahme zu Testzwecken zu.

Simpsons Verteidiger behaupteten daraufhin, es sei möglich, dass das fehlende Blut etwa 30 Tropfen dafür verwendet wurde, Simpson mit dem Tatort in Verbindung zu bringen und ihm die Tat anzuhängen.

Auch sei es nicht immer so, dass das Volumen nach mehreren Monaten noch genau der entnommenen Menge entspräche. Auch sei es möglich, dass bei Entnahmen zu Testzwecken geringe Mengen Blutes verschüttet würden oder in sonstiger Weise verloren gingen.

Ein erneutes Kreuzverhör durch Simpsons Anwälte war aus diesem Grund ebenfalls nicht möglich. Der für den Fall zuständige Kriminalist Dennis Fung gab an, drei Wochen nach der Tatnacht bemerkt zu haben, dass Blutspuren auf einem Eisentor am Hintereingang zu Browns Wohnung nicht gesichert wurden.

Die Blutspuren sind auf Fotos von der unmittelbaren Beweisaufnahme dokumentiert. Daraufhin kehrte er an den Tatort zurück, um die — seiner Aussage nach immer noch vorhandenen — Blutspuren zu sichern.

Trotz der verspäteten Sicherung und der damit verbundenen stärkeren Gefahr einer Zersetzung vorhandener DNA durch Sonnenlicht und andere Umwelteinflüsse fand sich in der nachträglich gesicherten Blutspur im Vergleich zu anderen zeitnah nach der Tat gesicherten Spuren eine teils über fach höhere Konzentration an verwertbarer DNA.

Rieders führte keine eigenen Tests durch, sondern sagte nur zu seiner eigenen Interpretation der Analyseergebnisse des FBI aus. Die Verteidiger Simpsons behaupteten, die nachträglich gesicherten Blutspuren stammten aus dem von Simpson entnommenen Blut und seien am Tatort platziert worden, um Simpson zu belasten.

Rieders und Martz gaben übereinstimmend an, dass die in den Blutspuren gefundene EDTA-Menge zu gering sei, als dass es sich um präpariertes Blut eines Verdächtigen gehandelt haben könnte.

EDTA könne jedoch durch Sonnenlichtexposition zersetzt werden. EDTA sei ein künstlicher Stoff, der in der Natur eigentlich nicht vorkomme, jedoch in vielen Produkten und Nahrungsmitteln enthalten sei und auf diese Weise in den menschlichen Körper gelangen könne.

In einer zweiten Analyse bei einem anderen Labor mit vermeintlich besseren Analyseverfahren wurden diese Gifte jedoch nicht gefunden, woraufhin die Anklage fallengelassen wurde.

Der für die Beweissicherung am Tatort verantwortliche Kriminalist Dennis Fung habe grundlegende Regeln der Ermittlungsarbeit missachtet.

Fung wurde insgesamt 9 Tage im Kreuzverhör vernommen — so lang wie kein anderer Zeuge. Fung verneinte, dies getan zu haben, seine Aussage wurde jedoch durch ein Video vom Tag der Beweissicherung widerlegt.

The decision may have affected the trial's outcome because it resulted in a jury pool that was less educated, had lower incomes, and contained more African Americans.

Gabriel notes that African Americans, unlike other minorities, are far more likely to be receptive to the claim of racially motivated fraud by the police.

In October , Judge Lance Ito started interviewing prospective jurors, each of whom had to fill out a page questionnaire.

On November 3, twelve jurors were seated with twelve alternates. Over the course of the trial, ten were dismissed for a wide variety of reasons.

Only four of the original jurors remained on the final panel. According to media reports, Clark believed women, regardless of race, would sympathize with the domestic violence aspect of the case and connect with Nicole personally.

On the other hand, the defense's research suggested that black women would not be sympathetic to Nicole, who was white, because of tensions about interracial marriages.

Both sides accepted a disproportionate number of female jurors. From an original jury pool of 40 percent white, 28 percent black, 17 percent Hispanic, and 15 percent Asian, the final jury for the trial had ten women and two men, of whom nine were black, two white and one Hispanic.

It broke the previous record with more than a month left to go. On April 5, , juror Jeanette Harris was dismissed because Judge Ito learned she had failed to disclose an incident of domestic abuse.

Ito then met with the jurors, who all denied Harris's allegations of racial tension among themselves. The following day, Ito dismissed the three deputies anyway, which upset the jurors that didn't complain because the dismissal appeared to lend credence to Harris's allegations, which they all denied.

Ito then ordered them to court and the 13 protesters responded by wearing all black and refusing to come out to the jury box upon arrival.

Clark was designated as the lead prosecutor and Darden became Clark's co-counsel. Prosecutors Hank Goldberg and William Hodgman, who have successfully prosecuted high-profile cases in the past, assisted Clark and Darden.

The prosecution argued that the domestic violence within the Simpson-Brown marriage culminated in her murder. Simpson's then girlfriend, Paula Barbieri, wanted to attend the recital with Simpson but he did not invite her.

After the recital, Simpson returned home to a voicemail from Barbieri ending their relationship. Simpson then drove over to Nicole Brown's home to reconcile their relationship as a result and when Nicole refused, Simpson killed her in a "final act of control.

The prosecution opened its case by calling LAPD dispatcher Sharon Gilbert and playing a four-minute call from Nicole Brown Simpson on January 1, , in which she expressed fear that Simpson would physically harm her and Simpson himself is even heard in the background yelling at her and possibly hitting her as well.

The officer who responded to that call, Detective John Edwards, testified next that when he arrived, a severely beaten Nicole Brown Simpson ran from the bushes where she was hiding and to the detective screaming "He's going to kill me, he's going to kill me," referring to O.

Pictures of Nicole Brown's face from that night were then shown to the jury to confirm his testimony. That incident led to Simpson's arrest and eventual pleading of no contest to one count of domestic violence for which he received probation for one year.

I really don't know about taking that thing. She tearfully testified to many episodes of domestic violence in the s, when she saw Simpson pick up his wife and hurl her against a wall, then physically throw her out of their house during an argument.

She also testified that Simpson was agitated with Nicole the night of his daughter's dance recital as well, the same night Nicole was murdered.

The prosecution planned to present 62 separate incidents of domestic violence, including three previously unknown incidents Brown had documented in several letters she had written and placed in a bank safety deposit box.

Judge Ito denied the defense's motion to suppress the incidents of domestic violence, but only allowed witnessed accounts to be presented to the jury because of Simpson's Sixth Amendment rights.

The letters Nicole Brown had written and the statements she made to friends and family were ruled inadmissible as hearsay because Brown was dead and unable to be cross-examined.

Despite this, the prosecution had witnesses for 44 separate incidents they planned to present to the jury. However, the prosecution dropped the domestic violence portion of their case on June 20, Christopher Darden later confirmed that to be true.

This dismissal of Simpson's abusive behavior from a female juror, who was also a victim of such abuse by her own husband, convinced the prosecution that the jury was not receptive to the domestic violence argument.

The defense retained renowned advocate for victims of domestic abuse, Dr. Lenore E. Walker was dropped from the witness list for "tactical reasons" after she submitted her report on the case.

The revelation of Simpson's abuse of Nicole is credited with turning public opinion against him. Walker was dropped from the defense witness list is credited with transforming public opinion on spousal abuse from a private familial matter to a serious public health issue.

Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran, testified on June 14, that Brown's time of death was estimated as between pm and pm.

Simpson was not seen again until pm when he answered the intercom at the front door for the limousine driver, Allan Park. Allan Park testified on March 28, that he arrived at Simpson's home at pm on the night of the murders and stopped at the Rockingham entrance: Simpson's Bronco was not there.

Park's testimony was significant because it explained the location of the glove found at Simpson's home.

Park said the "shadowy figure" initially approached the front door before heading down the southern walkway which leads to where the glove was found by Fuhrman.

The prosecution believed that Simpson had driven his Bronco to and from Brown's home to commit the murders, saw that Park was there and aborted his attempt to enter through the front door and tried to enter through the back instead.

During cross examination, Park conceded that he could not identify the figure but said he saw that person enter the front door and afterwards Simpson answered and said he was home alone but he was calling a friend over.

Park conceded that he did not notice any cuts on Simpson's left hand but added "I shook his right hand, not his left.

The prosecution presented a total of exhibits, including 61 drops of blood, [] of DNA evidence allegedly linking Simpson to the murders.

With no witnesses to the crime, the prosecution was dependent on DNA as the only physical evidence linking Simpson to the crime. Bodziak, testified that the bloody shoe prints found at the crime scene and inside Simpson's Bronco were made from a rare and expensive pair of Bruno Magli Italian shoes.

He determined the shoes were a size 12, the same size that Simpson wears, and are only sold at Bloomingdales. Only 29 pairs of that size were sold in the U.

Bodziak also testified that, despite two sets of footprints at the crime scene, only one attacker was present because they were all made by the same shoes.

During cross-examination Bailey suggested the murderer deliberately wore shoes that were the wrong size, which Bodziak dismissed as "ridiculous". Simpson denied ever owning a pair of those "ugly ass shoes" and there was only circumstantial evidence he did.

Although the prosecution could not prove that Simpson owned a pair of those shoes, Bodziak testified that a similar bloody shoe print was left on the floor inside Simpson's Bronco.

Scheck suggested that Fuhrman broke into the Bronco and left the footprint there; he produced a photo of Fuhrman walking through a puddle of blood.

Bodziak admitted that he was not able to confirm that the shoe print in the car definitely came from a Bruno Magli shoe, but dismissed Scheck's claim because none of the shoe prints at the crime scene were made by Fuhrman's shoes, making it unlikely he could have made a bloody shoe print in the Bronco.

Simpson hired a team of high-profile defense lawyers, initially led by Robert Shapiro , who was previously a civil lawyer known for settling, and then subsequently by Johnnie Cochran, who at that point was known for police brutality and civil rights cases.

Assisting Cochran were Carl E. Douglas and Shawn Holley. The defense team's reasonable doubt theory was summarized as "compromised, contaminated, corrupted" in opening statements.

Robert Huizenga testified on July 14, [] that Simpson was not physically capable of carrying out the murders due to chronic arthritis and old football injuries.

During cross-examination, the prosecution produced an exercise video that Simpson made a few weeks before the murders titled O.

Simpson Minimum Maintenance: Fitness for Men , which demonstrated that Simpson was anything but frail. Huizenga admitted afterwards that Simpson could have committed the murders if he was in "the throes of an adrenaline rush.

Michael Baden , a forensic pathologist, testified on August 10, [] and claimed the murders happened closer to pm, which is when Simpson has an alibi.

After the trial, Baden admitted his claim of Goldman's long struggle was inaccurate [] [] and that testifying for Simpson was a mistake. Gerdes admitted [] that Goldman's blood was in Simpson's Bronco [] despite Goldman never having an opportunity within his lifetime to be in the Bronco.

Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld argued that the results from the DNA testing were not reliable because the police were "sloppy" in collecting and preserving it from the crime scene.

The prosecution denied that the mistakes made by Fung and Mazzola changed the validity of the results. The contamination claim was made by microbiologist Dr.

John Gerdes. It is chronic in the sense that it doesn't go away. During cross-examination, Dr. Gerdes admitted there was no evidence that cross-contamination had occurred and that he was only testifying to "what might have occurred and not what actually did occur".

He accepted that the victims' blood was in the Bronco and Simpson's blood was at the crime scene and neither was due to contamination.

He also conceded that nothing happened during "packaging and shipping" that would affect the validity of the results at the two consulting labs.

The prosecution implied that Gerdes was not a credible witness: he had no forensic experience and had only testified for criminal defendants in the past and always said the DNA evidence against them was not reliable due to contamination.

Clark also implied that it was not a coincidence that the three evidence items he initially said were valid were the same three the defense claimed were planted while the other 58 were all false positives and the 47 substrate controls, which are used to determine if contamination occurred, were all false negatives.

Henry Lee testified on August 24, and admitted that Gerdes's claim was "highly improbable". Barry Scheck's eight-day cross-examination of Dennis Fung was lauded in the media.

What contamination and degradation will lead you to is an inconclusive result. It doesn't lead you to a false positive. The defense initially only claimed that three exhibits were planted by the police [] but eventually argued that virtually all of the blood evidence against Simpson was planted in a police conspiracy.

In closing arguments, Cochran called Fuhrman and Vannatter "twins of deception" [] and told the jury to remember Vannatter as "the man who carried the blood" [] and Fuhrman as "the man who found the glove.

The only physical evidence offered by the defense that the police tried to frame Simpson was the allegation that two of the DNA evidence samples tested in the case contained the preservative Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid , or EDTA.

Ironically, it was the prosecution who asked to have the samples tested for the preservative, not the defense. In order to support the claim, the defense pointed to the presence of EDTA , a preservative found in the purple-topped collection tubes used for police reference vials, in the samples.

On July 24, , Dr. Fredric Rieders , a forensic toxicologist who had analysed results provided by FBI special agent Roger Martz, testified that the level of EDTA in the evidence samples was higher than that which is normally found in blood: this appeared to support the claim they came from the reference vials.

Rieders to read out loud the portion of the EPA article that stated what the normal levels of EDTA in blood are, which he referenced during his testimony.

Rieders then claimed it was a "typo" [] [] but the prosecution produced a direct copy from the EPA disproving that claim.

Rieders the day before. When the defense accused their own witness of changing his demeanor to favor the prosecution, he replied "I cannot be entirely truthful by only giving 'yes' and 'no' answers".

Martz also tested his own unpreserved blood and got the same results for EDTA levels as the evidence samples, which he said conclusively disproved the claim the evidence blood came from the reference vials.

The defense alleged that Simpson's blood on the back gate at the Bundy crime scene was planted by the police. The blood on the back gate was collected on July 3, , rather than June 13, the day after the murders.

The volume of DNA was so high that the defense conceded that it could not be explained by contamination in the lab, yet noted that it was unusual for that blood to have more DNA on it than the other samples collected at the crime scene, especially since it had been left exposed to the elements for several weeks and after the crime scene had supposedly been washed over.

On March 20, Detective Vannatter testified that he instructed Fung to collect the blood on the gate on June 13 and Fung admitted he had not done so.

The prosecution responded by showing that a different photograph showed that the blood was present on the back gate on June 13 and before the blood had been taken from Simpson's arm.

Barry Scheck alleged the police had twice planted the victims' blood inside Simpson's Bronco. An initial collection was made on June 13; the defense accused Vannatter of planting the victims' blood in the Bronco when he returned to Simpson's home later that evening.

The prosecution responded that the Bronco had already been impounded by the time Vannatter returned and was not even at Rockingham. The defense alleged that the police had planted Brown's blood on the socks found in Simpson's bedroom.

The socks were collected on June 13 and had blood from both Simpson and Brown, but her blood on the socks was not identified until August 4. He had received both blood reference vials from the victims earlier that day from the coroner and booked them immediately into evidence.

Vannatter then drove back to Rockingham later that evening to hand deliver the reference vial for Simpson to Fung, which the defense alleged gave him opportunity to plant the blood.

Fung testified he could not see blood on the socks he collected from Simpson's bedroom [] but the prosecution later demonstrated that those blood stains are only visible underneath a microscope.

Detective Vannatter denied planting Nicole Brown's blood on the socks. The video from Willie Ford indicated that the socks had already been collected and stored in the evidence van before Vannatter arrived and footage from the media cameras present appeared to prove that he never went inside the evidence van when he arrived at Rockingham.

The last exhibit allegedly planted was the bloody glove found at Simpson's property by Detective Mark Fuhrman. Robert Shapiro later admitted he was Toobin's source.

Defense attorney F. Lee Bailey suggested that Fuhrman found the glove at the crime scene, picked it up with a stick and placed it in a plastic bag, and then concealed it in his sock when he drove to Simpson's home with Detectives Lange, Vannatter and Philips.

Bailey suggested that he then planted the glove in order to frame Simpson, with the motive either being racism or a desire to become the hero in a high-profile case.

The prosecution denied that Fuhrman planted the glove. They noted that several officers had already combed over the crime scene for almost two hours before Fuhrman arrived and none had noticed a second glove at the scene.

Detective Lange testified that 14 other officers were there when Fuhrman arrived and all said there was only one glove at the crime scene. Frank Spangler also testified that he was with Fuhrman for the duration of his time there and stated he would have seen Fuhrman purloin the glove if he had in fact done so.

Clark added that Fuhrman did not know whether Simpson had an alibi, if there were any witnesses to the murders, whose blood was on the glove, that the Bronco belonged to Simpson, or whether Kaelin had already searched the area where the glove was found.

During cross-examination by Bailey, [] Fuhrman denied that he had used the word "nigger" to describe African Americans in the ten years prior to his testimony.

The tapes were made between and by screenwriter named Laura Hart McKinny, who had interviewed Fuhrman at length for a Hollywood screenplay she was writing on women police officers.

The Fuhrman tapes became the cornerstone of the defense's case that Fuhrman's testimony lacked credibility. Clark called the tapes "the biggest red herring there ever was.

After McKinny was forced to hand over the tapes to the defense, Fuhrman says he asked the prosecution for a redirect to explain the context of those tapes but the prosecution and his fellow police officers abandoned him after Ito played the audiotapes in open court for the public to hear.

Fuhrman says he instantly became a pariah. On September 6, , Fuhrman was called back to the witness stand by the defense, after the prosecution refused to redirect him, to answer more questions.

The jury was absent but the exchange was televised.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Gedanken zu „Oj Simpson Fall“

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.